PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] from Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker on 2012-01-17 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from January 2012)

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:40:31 +0000
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Rn8L1-000312-70@tibor.w3.org>

PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/221

Raised by: Luc Moreau
On product: prov-dm

For completeness, we should define ordering constraint for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf. 


For wasAssociatedWith(a,ag), it feels that ag must have some overlap with a. 


For actedOnBehalfOf(ag1,ag2,a), it seem that ag2 should have existed before the overlap between ag1 and a.

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2012 12:40:39 UTC