- From: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:04:20 +0000
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
ISSUE-47 (topicReplyToName unflagged assertions): topicReplyToName has two unflagged assertions, some inappropriate. [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/47 Raised by: Eric Johnson On product: SOAP-JMS Binding specification >From email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0008.html The topicReplyToName has two unflagged RFC 2119 keywords * Specifies the name of the topic destination to which a response message SHOULD be sent. ALSO * if the variant is "jndi", topicReplyToName is not relevant and MUST be ignored. Proposal: Eliminate the two keywords: First bullet rewritten following the pattern of the resolution of ISSUE-46 * Specifies the name of the topic destination to which a response message will be sent. Second bullet rewrite: * as defined by [JMS URI], the topicReplyToName only makes sense if the URI variant is "queue" or "topic".
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 21:04:22 UTC