ISSUE-46 (replyToName spurious assertion): replyToName has "SHOULD" assertion about where the message should be sent. [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] from SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker on 2010-07-12 (public-soap-jms@w3.org from July 2010)

From: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:34:51 +0000
To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OYSWR-0006QI-EG@nelson.w3.org>

ISSUE-46 (replyToName spurious assertion): replyToName has "SHOULD" assertion about where the message should be sent. [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/46

Raised by: Eric Johnson
On product: SOAP-JMS Binding specification

>From email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html

Section 2.2: soapjms:replyToName definition: "Specifies the name of the
destination to which a response message SHOULD  be sent".

Problems:
 * Not flagged as normative
 * Redundant, as Protocol-2008 already indicates that it MUST be used to determine JMSReplyTo.

Proposal:

Change sentence in question to read: "Specifies the name of the destination to which a response message will be sent."

Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 23:34:52 UTC