Re: ACTION-11: Define a timeline for working on the editor's draft and the FPWD

> 9/24: first editor's draft available for review by the working group; the working group has two weeks to raise issues.
> 
> 10/8: deadline for reviews and raising issues as input for the editors; the editors have two weeks to address these issues.
> 
> 10/22: publication of FPWD
> 
> 11/1+2: F2F at TPAC; addressing open issues in the FPWD, working towards a more complete version
> 
> beginning of 2013: second public working drafts should be published (according to charter http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter#deliverables)

+1

I'm happy with this schedule and can commit as a co-Editor, given SteveS leads.


Cheers,
	   Michael

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel.: +353 91 495730
http://mhausenblas.info/

On 14 Sep 2012, at 00:32, Erik Wilde wrote:

> hello.
> 
> here's our proposal for the publication schedule of the editor's draft and the FPWD (this was our ACTION-11):
> 
> 9/24: first editor's draft available for review by the working group; the working group has two weeks to raise issues.
> 
> 10/8: deadline for reviews and raising issues as input for the editors; the editors have two weeks to address these issues.
> 
> 10/22: publication of FPWD
> 
> 11/1+2: F2F at TPAC; addressing open issues in the FPWD, working towards a more complete version
> 
> beginning of 2013: second public working drafts should be published (according to charter http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter#deliverables)
> 
> cheers,
> 
> dret.
> 
> -- 
> erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
>           | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
>           | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
> 

Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 07:20:56 UTC