Re: ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism from Irene Polikoff on 2015-11-12 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from November 2015)

From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:07:26 -0500
To: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D26A4D18.6769C%irene@topquadrant.com>

I may have mentioned this before, but in case I didn¹t, I do not believe
it is correct to say that the idea behind OWL is not to allow meta-classes
and to have classes, properties and individuals to be disjoint.

Irene Polikoff

On 11/11/15, 11:24 PM, "Arthur Ryman" <arthur.ryman@gmail.com> wrote:

>I feel that people have an easier time understanding models in which
>meta-classes are absent. This is the idea behind OWL and description
>logic in which things are either classes, properties, or individuals.

Received on Thursday, 12 November 2015 19:08:06 UTC