Re: ISSUE-43: change to \"common baseline\"?

On Mar 18, 2006, at 14:36, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Would it really break backwards compatibility for ECMA-script  
> implementations to change onreadystatechange from being a Function  
> to being an EventListener?
>
> A function following the version 1 spec will not take any  
> arguments. Such a function should work fine as an EventListener in  
> version 2, it just would not get access to the Event object.

Right, for Ecmascript the binding says (perhaps not clearly, or at  
not obviously enough) that EventListener is a Function, so I would  
expect the transition from Function to EventListener to be smooth,  
but perhaps I'm missing something.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Saturday, 18 March 2006 16:44:09 UTC