- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:07:03 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:09, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > I think this is the confusion over any of the 'optional' arguments in > PROV-N. It is unclear if this means that the argument is implied (ie. > existential quantification) or not applicable/present. It might be > good to go through all of the optionals in PROV-DM and make sure they > make that clear. I'll raise that as an issue. Tracker, this is ISSUE-311 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/311 -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 11:07:56 UTC