- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:14:40 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I would have appreciated individual issues for the things missing/wrong instead, but OK.. I'm going through the OWL file now and putting in rdfs:seeAlso links to the ProvRDF page for the concepts that I can verify are mapped. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 08:19, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Dear prov-o team, > > Unfortunately, I had to reopen ACTION-55 [1]. > > The team has done good work in specifying the PROV to RDF mapping. > It will be very helpful to discuss alignment between PROV-DM and PROV-O, > and the team has already identified issues for discussion. That's great. > > However, the PROV to RDF mapping is not reflected in the ontology. > Some constructs (class/property) occurring in the prov-rdf mapping > are simply missing in the ontology. > Furthermore, cardinality constraints, etc, need to be specified. > > Before discussing alignment, we need to have an ontology. > > May I remind you how important this is for the progress of the WG to > complete > this ontology. > > Regards, > Luc > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/55 > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 11:15:31 UTC