Re: wrt "meta pull-requests" milestone...

I'm good either way, I just like having a more targeted list however we go
about it.

Thank you both!
J.C.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:59 AM Emil Lundberg <emil@yubico.com> wrote:

> Works for me. The reason I made it a separate milestone was to keep them
> from cluttering the agenda for the weekly calls. But on the other hand they
> tend to be much shorter-lived, so that might not be much of an issue -
> especially if we add a clear label for them.
>
> /Emil
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:52 PM =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>
> wrote:
>
>> ...which in general is a good idea, tho I'm wondering whether we ought
>> to make  "meta pull-requests"  a _label_, and then assign such PRs to
>> the milestone that the target PR is assigned to?  this way the meta-PRs
>> will show up in lists filtered by milestone such as PropRec.
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> thx,
>>
>> =JeffH
>>
>> --
>
> Emil Lundberg
>
> Software Developer | Yubico <http://www.yubico.com/>
>
>
>