Re: Issue-223 - how to formally close it?

Hi Antoine,
Following  the discussion  in  today's the call,  it seems  that
marking the issue  as "postponed" is not an option on the table.. and
we need to mark it as "closed" to get at the next stage.

I am copying part of  the minutes because at the time we discussed it,
you hadn't joined yet,  ...

 <annette_g> riccardoAlbertoni:  does anyone know if we can vote on
the final version of the DQV even if we postpone the issue?
[15:29] <annette_g> hadleybeeman:  The answer is no. We need to have
all the issues closed and all the actions finished and then be able to
take that table with us along with the meeting minutes with us when we
meet with the director.

Have a good weekend!
Riccardo


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Riccardo Albertoni <riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Date: 24 June 2016 at 14:20
Subject: Re: Issue-223 - how to formally close it?
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>


Dear Antoine and all,
I like the idea of splitting the issue, keeping separate the
meta-modelling part, which will be marked as postponed.

Are  we allowed to vote and publish the  DQV as group note even if we
have  formally  postponed some  "issues" ?
I think the answer should be "yes",    but  I would prefer to be sure
that this is ok with the W3C rules ..

Cheers,
Riccardo




On 24 June 2016 at 13:16, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Without the attn to Werner this time...
>
> Our proposal at [1] somehow stops half-way with respect to the general
> problem of Issue-223 [2]. On the one hand, we believe we have a good pattern
> for representing parameter values in instance DQV data, and this is a reason
> to close Issue-223. On the other hand we don't have a generic framework for
> (meta-)modeling parameters properties, and we believe we can't do one now,
> which is a reason to postpone Issue-223 and include a note about it in the
> new Appendix [3].
>
> We could also create a new 'break-out' issue about meta-modeling, which we
> would postpone, while closing 223. I think for now this would have my
> preference.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Antoine
>
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Jun/0061.html
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/223
> [3] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#Parameters
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean.
>
>



--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 24 June 2016 14:39:05 UTC