Re: RDF-ISSUE-73: IRI_REF vs. IRIref [RDF Turtle]

On Aug 12, 2011 6:19 AM, "RDF Working Group Issue Tracker" <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> RDF-ISSUE-73: IRI_REF vs. IRIref [RDF Turtle]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/73
>
> Raised by: Gavin Carothers
> On product: RDF Turtle
>
> Grammar should not use terms that are so close that the editor screwed
them up while writing a parser.

Heh, sorry.
There are only 60 productions in turtle;case variations of "IRIref" should
be sufficient to express the entire language.

Note that both productions come from SPARQL so this issue applies there as
well.