- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:37:45 +0000
- To: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Cc: Sam Goto <goto@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 5 December 2013 05:20, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >>> On 26 November 2013 19:26, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net> wrote: >>>> I've reported these problems with the schema.org docs over the past few >>>> months, but they're still present in the latest 1.0d update. So I'll try >>>> to consolidate them and hopefully they can be dealt with in a single >>>> pass for 1.0e! >>> >>> Thanks for your persistence! >> >> <snip> >> >>> We have a 1.0e release about ready to go but waiting on some final >>> checks (and slowed down by US vacation). I've just added these tweaks. >>> >>> Here's a test build (which includes Accessibility and Order): >>> >>> http://sdopending.appspot.com/ItemAvailability >>> http://sdopending.appspot.com/CreativeWork >>> http://sdopending.appspot.com/citation >>> >>> also http://sdopending.appspot.com/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html >>> >>> How's that looking? >> >> Looks great Dan--thanks! > > Dang. I hate to say this, but it looks like all of of these problems > have returned in the actual production 1.0e revision that was shipped > out (and on sdopending now as well) :/ Oh - that's not good! Ah well, at least we've got good candidates for another release next week... In general I'm trying to get schema.org onto a tighter release cycle. There's a lot to do, and a lot of small fixes that can be made. And unmade, it seems. Thanks for that catch, I'll get these fixed again. cheers, Dan
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 09:38:16 UTC