Nice! Friendly amendment? I think that "widely differing physical abilities" is more poetic than "widely different physical abilities". What do you think? On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > LGTM. I noticed a couple of tiny grammatical nits, so a tidied version is > here: > > This specification has no defined user interface. Consequently, there are > no specific accessibility requirements on implementations. However, to the > extent that an implementation provides user interactions to support this > specification, the implementation must ensure that the interface is exposed > to the platform accessibility API. Moreover, implementors should take into > consideration the needs of their users with varying abilities when > designing solutions that implement this specification. For example, the use > of biometric authentication techniques should be varied enough to allow for > people with widely different physical abilities. > > Léonie. > -- > @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem > > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 13:13:31 UTC