Re: Need Update to TTML1 Errata

Hi Nigel,

> This is (mostly*) dependent on us closing Issue-259, which is dependent on Pierre's
> review, as agreed in our meeting this afternoon.

No objection to closing ISSUE-259.

Best,

-- Pierre


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> This is (mostly*) dependent on us closing Issue-259, which is dependent on
> Pierre's review, as agreed in our meeting this afternoon. Others are at
> liberty to review and comment too of course.
>
> So we should not put these errata to TR until Issue-259 is closed. When it
> has been closed I'm happy for these errata to be considered part of the
> solution to Issue-259 and push through ASAP after that. ASAP here is >= 10
> days after resolution of Issue-259 as per our charter.
>
> * By the way I didn't expect the use of zero duration to be permitted via
> this errata document since it is a substantive change rather than a
> clarification. Is there a pressing reason why it needs to be in TTML 1 and
> can't wait until TTML 2?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nigel
>
>
> On 17/07/2014 16:26, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>
> I have been updating the TTML1 Errata document in the repository [1], and
> now have three additional items (see those marked as "published 2014-07-17).
> We need to push these errata through to the TR page [2].
>
> I would like for either (1) Thierry to push these to TR ASAP, or (2) defer
> the push until we discuss in a teleconference. Nigel, please recommend an
> approach.
>
> [1]
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/default/ttml1/spec/ttml1-errata.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/09/ttml1-errata.html

Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 01:12:30 UTC