Re: ACTION-27: Propose text re the "spec's positioning" (see LC comment from Alex Russell) from Rick Byers on 2013-03-26 (public-pointer-events@w3.org from January to March 2013)

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:10:55 -0700
To: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
Cc: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY982z_UKs=sGUy5_4q4PR=o3W_nufRCEtFNqciQXedKOg@mail.gmail.com>

Looks good to me too.

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>wrote:

>   On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Scott González <
> scott.gonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This looks good to me. Is "option section" supposed to be "optional
> section"?****
>
> ** **
>
> Yes****
>

Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 13:11:43 UTC