Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML]

Hi, I just modified the example as suggested.
The issue is now pending review, I think we can close it.

Best,
Daniel

2012/5/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

> PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/373
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: PROV-O HTML
>
> There is a nice progression from the simple ('starting point') terms via
> the expanded one to the qualified ones. However... in 3.2 the example uses
> prov:qualifiedGeneration although, at that point, the reader does not have
> any idea what that means. It is probably not really important in this
> example anyway; I would propose to remove it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
>