Re: Org Ontology

See ACTION-55:

https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/55

Dani

El 24 de febrero de 2012 14:24, Daniel Vila
<dvila@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>escribió:

> Hi Phil,
>
>
>
> El 24 de febrero de 2012 11:56, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> escribió:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Through a comment on the EU's Joinup Platform [1] I've been alerted to
>> two things I hadn't noticed:
>>
>> 1. The Org Ontology has already been translated into French - formidable!
>>
>
> Great!!
>
>
>>
>> 2. The current editor's draft doesn't link to the OWL file (I think it
>> should).
>>
>> @Daniel - unless you object, I'll edit the file to add in a link to the
>> ontology by simply adding a line above the copyright statement saying "This
>> document is also available as a non-normative @@@OWL Ontology@@@
>>
>> I'm hoping re-spec will let me do that without too many problems :-(
>>
>
> My fault :-( feel free to edit the file. Let me know if I can help
>
>>
>> And, erm... Daniel, erm... you wouldn't be able to add in a Spanish
>> translation of the ontology as well would you? Showing that the vocab is
>> truly truly multi-lingual on day 1 would, IMO, be a really good thing to do.
>>
>
> That'd be a great idea, I'll see what I can do :-)
>
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>
> Dani
>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/**asset/core_business/topic/**
>> core-organization-ontology#**comment-11606<https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/core_business/topic/core-organization-ontology#comment-11606>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Phil Archer
>> W3C eGovernment
>> http://www.w3.org/egov/
>>
>> http://philarcher.org
>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>> @philarcher1
>>
>>
>