On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > >> It is unethical for us to make and use technologies that are > intentionally > >> inaccessible, whether that be preventing deaf users from knowing what is > >> being said in a movie production of Hamlet, or preventing English > >> professors from critiquing parts of that same movie. > > > > Baloney. > > Which part is baloney? The part where deaf people get to enjoy > Hamlet, or the part where English professors get to critique it? the part where DRM/content protection is equated with intentionally denying access to impaired users
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 22:12:53 UTC