On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote: > On 13 November 2013 18:18, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > I'm not sure if this was accidental or deliberate. We have decided > > before to use buganizer, not this issue tracker. Does anyone wish to > > pursue this? > > Strangely enough, after seeing what happens, I am liking the issue > tracker quite a lot. Oh, my bad. I will be happy to do whatever. > I think that EKR raised this one. Yes. > > (side note: If it moved out of the spec, where would it go?) > > I don't think that the intent was to move it out of the spec. I > believe that the point was to move the common logic to a single place > to avoid the usual errors that arise from duplication and to improve > the signal to noise ratio of the affected sections > Yes. -Ekr
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 02:23:51 UTC