- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:03:17 +0100
- To: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuil@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-rdf-dawg" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Just for documentation, this closes ACTION-376, right?
Can we approve these tests
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/bindings/
so today?
Axel
On 13 May 2011, at 12:37, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> everything is fixed now. This discharges me of that action.
>
> cheers,
>
> Carlos
>
> 2011/4/26 Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
> binding05:
> has no BINDING clause
>
> SELECT ?s ?o1 ?o2
> {
> ?s ?p1 ?o1 .
> ?s ?p2 ?o2 .
> }
>
> so I'd expect ?o1 and ?o2 in both orders in results which is more results than in the solutions proposed.
>
> Andy
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 13:03:49 UTC