Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

+1

Satya

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote:

> +1
>
> -- Stephan
>
> On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
> proposal:
> >
> > "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
> >
> > However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all process
> executions to specify a duration.
> >
> > I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
> >
> > "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
> >
> > In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> > this proposal?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> >
> >
>
>
>