Re: ISSUE-133 modal-attribute - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

Hi Maciej,

If ted produces a proposal that that is acceptable to the working group I
would be more than happy to withdraw mine. If ted's proposal is delivered in
1 week or 6 weeks it makes no difference to me.

with regards
Stevef

On 24 June 2011 00:30, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Again I make the point, no one expects implementors to take and run with
> the first pass at speccing the feature behaviour, its a starting point from
> which expert minds can develop and mature the feature until it is ready to
> implement. I just want to see something down on writing in the spec  to get
> the ball rolling.
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> It sounds to me like, at this stage, no one is objecting to putting
> something in the spec. It seems to me that Ted wants a little extra time to
> make a more fleshed-out proposal that covers some of these details. So far,
> no one has expressed interest in a zero-change proposal. So assuming that
> remains the case, the use case will end up covered, and probably quite early
> in the Last Call cycle. Perhaps if you like where Ted goes with his
> proposal, the two of you could consider collaborating, since it sounds like
> you have roughly the same goals in mind.
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html