- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:22:55 +0100
- To: "Kingsley (Uyi) Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 25 Jan 2014, at 17:07, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 1/25/14 3:07 AM, Henry Story wrote: >>> >>> Very true. What do you propose as a stable identifier for the LDP1.0 interaction model as distinct from the resource itself? >>> >> ldp:Container should do . It is a class whose intension sets the criteria for selecting the members >> both actual and non actual that belong to it. The definition is provided by the LDP spec. >> Being a member of the ldp:Container class is to behave the way the spec says those resources >> should behave. On a GET they return a Graph, on a POST they create something, etc... >> >> Hence there is no problem with >> >> <> a ldp:Container . >> >> So you can also have something like >> >> <> ldp:interaction ldp:Container . >> >> but that would just end up implying the first anyway. >> >> >> Henry > > And for the sake of compromise we could also claim: > > <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#interaction> > <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#equivalentProperty> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml#profile> . > > OR > > <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#interaction> > <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#rdfs:subPropertyOf> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml#profile> . You can't get that with the current definition of rel=profile, because ldp:interaction would relate a resource and a class, whereas rel=profile wants to relate a representation and something. And those are quite different types of relations. Indeed that was my argument for why rel=profile can't do the required job. see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2014Jan/0090.html > > I would like to believe this shows how RDF [1] can solve this problem, since this really what (I believe) RDF addresses in a unique way. RDF is flexible, but 2+2=4 and logic does constrain one to being consistent. Which is a good thing in the long term. Logic is to the Web of data as physics is to the building of skyscrapers. > > > [1] http://bit.ly/1dUSAFG -- RDF described using RDF. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 16:23:55 UTC