- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:01:58 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML Weekly WG <public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org>, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi sam, > One week is *not* sufficient time to justify raising an issue. All that is required from the editor is a simple yes or no response and as the new heartbeat is due to be published it would be good to have information in the HTML5 spec, which is why I am pursuing the issue with such vigour, but as you disagree that it should be raised now I will remove the issue. Can you provide me with an esitmate of how much time I should wait before it is sifficient? regards Stevef On 11 June 2010 12:52, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 06/11/2010 07:22 AM, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> I do not beleive that it is beyond the editors capacity to respond >> one or or the other to my request, in a timely fashion. So am >> escalating this to an issue. > > One week is *not* sufficient time to justify raising an issue. > > - Sam Ruby > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 12:02:52 UTC