- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:10:33 -0400
- To: Bogdan Brinza <bbrinza@microsoft.com>
- Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 2014-06-09 19:59, Bogdan Brinza a écrit : > Another class of issues we've encountered while investigating bugs is > image sizing. > > Consider the following two examples: > http://jsfiddle.net/boggydigital/6D5Nc/ > > > 1) Image has max-height: 100% and 50px on one of the > grandparents. IE and Firefox resolve size using image intrinsic size, > Chrome uses 50px. > > 2) Is similar to 1, but uses height: 100% and 50px on one of the > grandparents. Again, IE and Firefox do same thing and Chrome uses 50px > for height. > > In our investigations this was root cause for many interoperability > issues on mobile sites such as Amazon.com, HM.com, SI.com and few > others. > > As with earlier textarea overflow question - we'd like to clarify the > expected behavior here and ultimately achieve better interoperability. Bogdan, I'm working on submitting (later, probably this week-end) these 2 reduced tests http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/image-percent-001.xht http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/image-percent-002.xht based on your original demo-page. I dropped the list-item and the inline-block declaration. Please do not bookmark these tests as their filenames will most likely change before submission. I also need to edit the assert text and check a few more issues. ------------- I have checked quickly http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/chapter-10.htm#s10.5 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/chapter-10.htm#s10.6 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/chapter-10.htm#s10.7 to see if we didn't have already 1 or 2 tests like yours and I haven't found any yet. Gérard
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 05:11:06 UTC