- From: Sabrina Kirrane <sabrina.kirrane@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:00:42 +0100
- To: public-poe-wg@w3.org
> So the question is, do we make such “outdated” terms non-normative, or > do we remove/deprecate them? +1 for remove/deprecate them Regards, Sabrina On 25/10/2016 06:14, Renato Iannella wrote: > >> On 24 Oct. 2016, at 17:42, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at >> <mailto:simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>> wrote: >> >> We are mostly talking about adding new concepts to ODRL and/or >> extending already existing ones. But we've never questioned the >> practicality/applicability of some of ODRL's (legacy) concepts. For >> example, we have actions like install/uninstall [1,2] or move [3] that >> were added to ODRL 1.0 back in 2002 [4], but were hardly changed ever >> since and seem oddly specific considering actions like "download" or >> "query" aren't included in ODRL. > > These mainly were from MPEG-21 requirements….A long time ago (when > installing software was an art form ;-) > > We did touch on this point in Lisbon, when we discussed normative V > non-normative terms. > (This topic is on the teleconference agenda.) > > I think, as you say, if we ask “does anyone use/need this”…there will be > silence. > > For some terms, they should become non-normative (maybe many will). > > However, for “outdated” concepts, we should consider > removing/deprecating them. > > So the question is, do we make such “outdated” terms non-normative, or > do we remove/deprecate them? > > Renato Iannella, Monegraph > Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group > -- Assistant Professor, Institute for Management Information Systems, Vienna University of Economics and Business Tel: +43-1-31336-4494 E-mail: sabrina.kirrane [at] wu.ac.at http://www.wu.ac.at/ec/team/sabrina-kirrane/
Received on Monday, 31 October 2016 12:01:12 UTC