Re: Tracing action items from previous F2F meeting

On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Wonsuk Lee wrote:

> Hi. active members!
> From Toronto F2F meeting, we have more than 10 action items as below. So I would like to know about current status of them. I hope if possible we have done this before upcoming F2F.
>  
> -- Action items from the meeting, 27th Aug.
>  
> From Action01 to Action03 belong to Marcos.

  
> Action01: file a bug about maybe relaxing dependency on sniff [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-sysapps-minutes.html#action01]

Done. See:
https://github.com/sysapps/app-uri/commit/3f180e9439bd1631b78ce66113e904bcaa9daffb
  
> Action02: make it clearer that uuid is not a hard requirement [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-sysapps-minutes.html#action02]


The spec already states that:

“It is recommended that a [UUID] be used as the value of the authority component (but it's not mandatory! Other types of authorities, like reverse domain name notation, are allowed). Using a [UUID] makes it improbable that two URIs will be alike, and also makes them hard to guess. "

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:00:47 UTC