- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:22:02 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 21/11/2016 6:46, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > shapes-ISSUE-207 (Parameters): Parameter descriptions for constraint components [SHACL Spec] > > http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/207 > > Raised by: Karen Coyle > On product: SHACL Spec > > Last email: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016Oct/0062.html > > However, the list parameters are > not uniformly described - see sh:in vs sh:languageIn. > As well, in some cases an example is given but in most there is no example. > So there is still variability in wording. I do not see any variability in wording between sh:in and sh:languageIn, so this seems to have been addressed. And even if the wording were slightly different, why would that be a problem? I also checked that every constraint component has an example, except sh:lessThanOrEquals which is a trivial variation of sh:lessThan. So I am not sure what remains to be done here. Holger > > I think that it is up to the working group to put in the effort to check the > parameter descriptions to see if there are any problems. > > peter > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 06:22:37 UTC