- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:29:05 -0800
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Cc: Tom Lowenthal <tom@mozilla.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:00 PM, Jonathan Mayer wrote: > The provisions on outsourcing are not "overly simplistic" in the slightest. The group worked through them at Santa Clara, on the list, and on multiple calls. We've talking through myriad hypotheticals, including service providers like a cloud computing platform. > > Unless you have a new use case, I think this is all long since closed. Those sections are marked as PENDING REVIEW in the document, and the particular issue we are talking about now (ISSUE-123) is still OPEN. Since neither of you are on the hook to implement this, I suggest you pay attention to my concerns: I object to this wording if it includes third parties acting as a first party. A third-party acting as a first-party may present itself as the first-party because it is already constrained by the section defining "acting as a first-party". ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 02:29:29 UTC