- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:22:39 -0400
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Luc, I'm closing this action as the issue is still open in the tracker, and we are continuing to consider it. Regards, Tim On Apr 16, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Thanks, Luc. > > We'll leave 268 open as we consider this option. > > Regards, > Tim > > On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > >> >> Hi prov-o team, >> >> ISSUE-84, ISSUE-262, and ISSUE-263 can be closed. They are addressed by the current document. >> >> Regarding ISSUE-268, irrespective of the two-level ontology suggested originally, it would be >> good to decide whether there will be an attempt to define constraints (such as in prov-dm-constraints) in >> a separate ontology (or even the current one, if it's feasible) or in some form of rule language, or other. >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:23:28 UTC