Re: shapes-ISSUE-144 (substitution): substition is sometimes used instead of pre-binding [SHACL Spec] from Holger Knublauch on 2016-04-10 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 12:39:15 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <5709BCD3.6000508@topquadrant.com>

I don't understand this ISSUE. In the sh:PropertyScope case you mention, 
either substitution or pre-binding would have exactly the same effect. I 
see no need to complicate this further with another forward reference to 
pre-binding.

Holger


On 9/04/2016 4:13, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-144 (substitution): substition is sometimes used instead of pre-binding [SHACL Spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/144
>
> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
> On product: SHACL Spec
>
> The current document uses substitution in some places where it appears that pre-binding is meant.
>
> For example,
>
> 2.1.3.1 Property scopes (sh:PropertyScope)
>
> The scope class sh:PropertyScope selects all subjects that have at least one value for a given property sh:predicate. In the following SPARQL query, the variable $predicate is assumed to be substituted with the given value of sh:predicate.
>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 10 April 2016 02:39:49 UTC