Re: shapes-ISSUE-125 (sh:NodeConstraint missing): sh:NodeConstraint is mentioned but never defined [SHACL Spec] from Holger Knublauch on 2016-04-06 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:59:52 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <5704C1F8.8090905@topquadrant.com>

sh:NodeConstraint is now defined (as good as possible, pending the 
metamodel discussion), so I think this ISSUE-125 can be closed. See

     http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#shape-constraints

Holger



On 7/03/2016 9:01, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> This whole topic needs to be cleaned up once we have finalized the 
> metamodel. I am reluctant to spend time on this as long as ISSUE-95 is 
> open.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 7/03/2016 4:42, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> shapes-ISSUE-125 (sh:NodeConstraint missing): sh:NodeConstraint is 
>> mentioned but never defined [SHACL Spec]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/125
>>
>> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
>> On product: SHACL Spec
>>
>> sh:NodeConstraint is mentioned but never defined in the SHACL document.
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 08:00:27 UTC