- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:44:14 +0000
- To: Renato Iannella <renato@knowledgeflux.com>, "public-ole-comment@w3.org" <public-ole-comment@w3.org>
- Cc: Ben Whittam Smith <benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com>
Hi Renato, Despite our best efforts, the charter wasn't discussed at this week's management meeting. I'll talk to Ralph later today and get a better idea of time line - probably after Christmas now I'm afraid. On the plus side, it gives us time to consider your name proposal - which seems OK to me - as long as the P & O WG doesn't cause anyone to think we're working on a new shipping line (http://www.poferries.com/). Phil. On 16/12/2015 12:38, Renato Iannella wrote: > >> On 16 Dec 2015, at 2:09 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >> >> The only one I have not acted on is Renato's request to call the WG 'ODRL' and to expand that acronym as Open Digital Resource Licensing WG > > What about just shortening the WG name to “Permissions and Obligations” ? > > Renato Iannella > Head of Innovation and Emerging Technologies, KnowledgeFlux > Level 7, 100 Edward St, Brisbane 4000 AUSTRALIA +61 4 1313 2206 > > > > > > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Friday, 18 December 2015 09:44:06 UTC