- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 18:51:45 +0200
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
- CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
On 05/13/2015 06:42 PM, Social Web Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > social-ACTION-64: Document reasoning for requiring https (possibly coordinate it with harry) > > http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/64 > > Assigned to: Pavlik elf some relevant discussions in ActivityPump repo https://github.com/w3c-social/activitypump/issues/15 I also mention there that during standardization at IETF, Webfinger spec made HTTPS mandatory. IMO if we don't document clearly why we consider requiring HTTPS (at least for *identity* document) we will keep finding ourselves arguing about it over and over http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-05-13/line/1431535212902
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 16:51:59 UTC