Re: [Encoding] false statement [I18N-ACTION-328][I18N-ISSUE-374]

On 28/08/2014 16:27, Larry Masinter wrote:
> It isn't to anyone's benefit that there are two conflicting sources of info about character encodings.
>
> I think if the IANA Character Sets registry is obsolete, the right thing is to write an Internet Draft saying it's obsolete, and pointing people to this document instead.
>
> If you get objections from folks in the IETF, then address those objections; for example, by including more historical information and discussion of use by non-web applications.
>
> So no, I don't find the resolution satisfactory. I'm willing to help push through such a document in the IETF but would like some help.

Hello Larry,

The request related to your original comment, which pointed out that the 
Encoding spec could not unilaterally obsolete an IANA registry and the 
thread developed to suggest that the statement needed better scoping. 
We have proposed a solution to those issues.

I see the divergence of this thread into a discussion about whether 
obsoletion of the IANA registry should now be proposed as a separate issue.

RI

Received on Friday, 29 August 2014 07:05:15 UTC