Re: LDPR vs LDPC interaction models

Hi Steve,

we appreciate your time. See my comments inline.

On 25/02/14 19:05, Steve Speicher wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Sergio Fernández <
> sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:
>> in our current implementation of the specification in Apache Marmotta
>> [1], besides some other minor interpretation issues, we do not really
>> understand what Section 6.4.5 [2] aims to describe about honoring the LDPR
>> and LDPC interaction models. From the current spec, it is not clear what
>> those "interaction models" actually define, and what the difference between
>> both is. Could you please clarify this point?
>
> I will give the editors an action to improve on this section, let me put in
> it simplest terms and the intent:
> - LDPRs will only have interaction models of LDPRs.  It makes no sense to
> have in the
> - LDPCs could be have as LDPRs or LDPCs.  If an LDPC is created by sending
> a request entity body a LDPC and using the "Link: rel=type href=
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource", then that means it behaves as it
> doesn't know about LDPC section.  Meaning things like POSTing to it don't
> create members and update membership/containment triples or that when a
> contained resource is deleted, the containment triple is removed.

I think I get it, although I'm not totally sure to understand the 
motivation behind such behavior. Basically that's way to create LDPC 
with limited capabilities, not accepting new members after its creation 
or data about deleted members.

Is that correct?  OK, we'll think about how to address it's implementation.

Improving that section may help for sure.

Thanks.

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Senior Researcher
Knowledge and Media Technologies
Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria
T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925
sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at
http://www.salzburgresearch.at

Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 11:41:37 UTC