Data Cube update

I've carried out my actions from last week to ping people, directly and 
indirectly, to encourage further implementation reports.

This has resulted in 3 responses so far from people who hope to submit 
conformance reports.

Thanks to Ghislain for his report. I've done some formal reports on some 
of my own usage and restructured the implementations page [1]. I think 
we are in fairly good shape - a healthy range of usage and above the 
minimum formal conformance reports - though there is ISSUE-69 to resolve.

There are two groups of "optional" vocabulary elements for which we 
don't have any direct evidence of usage yet. I've sent out some follow 
up pings to see if we can remedy that. If not then I think we can 
construct a reasonable argument that it is preferable to proceed to PR 
with those in rather than restart the process just to remove them.

I've also updated the draft to use the new respec as recommended by Sandro.

Dave

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Implementations

Received on Monday, 4 November 2013 09:42:45 UTC