Re: paging in editor's draft

John, is it that much of a performance benefit not make all pages doubly-linked?
All the best, Ashok
On 10/28/2013 12:42 PM, John Arwe wrote:
> I mentioned on the call today some early feeback from EricP.
>
> In addition to the 2 typos that I'm fixing, this is more substantive:
>
> EricP>  I thing we voted on last and prev being a package, i.e.:
> EricP> LDP servers that serve a last page link MUST provide and HTTP <code>Link</code>
>
> I'm not clear on the WG's intent here.  I don't care either way, it's just unclear from the minutes and emails what the intent is/was.
>
> In both his amended proposal [1] and the original [2], he used a term "doubly linked servers".  From the feedback above, it's possible that his intent was:
>
> - two classes of servers, in terms of the paging links
>
> - all provide first+next
>
> - only "doubly linked" ones provide prev+last
>
> In the approved proposal [2], "doubly-linked servers" was used without definition.  I (obviously?) did not draw the conclusion that the linkage above exists.  I have zero problem writing it that way, I just want to be sure that all in the WG (even if that's "aside from me") have the same understanding.
>
> If anyone objects to Eric's interpretation, speak up and we can hash it out on the mailing list (and if necessary, get it on the meeting agenda).  If I see no objections by Friday, I'll align the draft with that.
>
> Since I'm here anyway, one further note: as detailed in the action [3], I drafted changes to align with the amended proposal [2] (adds link rel=collection) AND generalized it so that it CAN apply to resources other then LDPRs (any HTTP resource, now, although LDP only says how LDPR pages could be combined for re-form [a potentially incomplete copy of] the paged resource's state).
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0081.html
>
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0055.html
>
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/105
>
> Best Regards, John
>
> Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages <http://w3.ibm.com/jct03019wt/bluepages/simpleSearch.wss?searchBy=Internet+address&location=All+locations&searchFor=johnarwe>
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
>

Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 17:28:46 UTC