Re: membershipSubject clarification

I have to admit that this indirection about the subject causes confusion 
to me...

Talk in 5 minutes.

On 30/04/13 18:11, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Hi all,
> On Monday we agreed to close Issue-61 which suggested to drop
> membershipSubject and focus on clarifying the spec instead.
>
> To get us started I'd like to highlight that the editor's draft has an
> expanded example 3 which may clarify things a bit:
>
> # The following is an elaborated representation of
> #   http://example.org/netWorth/nw1
> @prefix ldp:<http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#>.
> @prefix o:<http://example.org/ontology/>.
> <>
>     a o:NetWorth;
>     o:netWorthOf<http://example.org/users/JohnZSmith>;
>     o:asset
>        <assetContainer/a1>,
>        <assetContainer/a2>;
>     o:liability
>        <liabilityContainer/l1>,
>        <liabilityContainer/l2>,
>        <liabilityContainer/l3>.
>
> <assetContainer/>
>     a ldp:Container;
>     dcterms:title "The assets of JohnZSmith";
>     ldp:membershipSubject<.>;
>     ldp:membershipPredicate o:asset.
>
> <liabilityContainer/>
>     a ldp:Container;
>     dcterms:title "The liabilities of JohnZSmith";
>     ldp:membershipSubject<.>;
>     ldp:membershipPredicate o:liability.
>
> This defines two containers (assetContainer and libabilityContainer)
> corresponding two different membership predicates (respectively o:asset
> and o:liability) around the same subject resource (netWorth/nw1).
>
> I would appreciate if Henry and others could ask specific questions about
> this design so we can try to answer them and see how the spec needs to be
> clarified.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Salzburg Research
+43 662 2288 318
Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II
A-5020 Salzburg (Austria)
http://www.salzburgresearch.at

Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 14:03:43 UTC