- From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:47:37 +0100
- To: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>
- CC: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Hi, On 15/02/13 08:11, Raúl García Castro wrote: > El 14/02/13 19:48, Steve Speicher escribió: >> How would one point to the spec? rdfs:seeAlso ? I would expect that >> eventually http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp would direct to an HTML rep (when >> requested) and the spec doesn't feel like the right thing but a simple >> HTML page perhaps generated from the vocab document. Is there some >> W3C best practice on this? > > I would use rdfs:isDefinedBy to say that the specification document > defines the ontology rdfs:isDefinedBy of every term should link to the ontology itself, not its spec. AFAIK there is no property with such purpose, so generally people use rdfs:seeAlso for it. For generating such specification automatically from the ontology there are some tools: Parrot [1], Specgen [2], etc. The first one is easier to use, but the second one is more customizable to get a proper W3C spec (we use it for instance at the WebId XG [3]). I can help on that. The Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies [4] contains some useful hints on how to publish it. [1] http://ontorule-project.eu/parrot [2] http://github.com/specgen/specgen [3] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/file/e29e9282b565/ontologies/specgen [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ -- Sergio Fernández Salzburg Research +43 662 2288 318 Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II A-5020 Salzburg (Austria) http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 07:48:28 UTC