Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call

On Sep 4, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote:

> Aleecia,
> 
> I'm often uncertain what to make of comments on the list that aren't followed up.  At times, to be sure, that's been a signal that many in the group agree.  But on more than a few occasions it's just meant that others didn't spot the message, didn't understand it, or didn't see value in further debate.  (An example of the last: my ISSUE-137 thread with Roy about service provider status.)  Whatever the import of radio silence, I completely agree with this resolution approach of explicitly surfacing the issue on a call.

Indeed. That is why I am raising it explicitly. Thanks for your thoughtful remarks.

	Aleecia

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 21:59:56 UTC