issue-62 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)

Hi Yves, all,

thanks for looking into this.

Would it resolve your comment to

- clarify the description like in the attached document? It doesn't add 
any attributes, but just re-orders the definitions.
- change the related constraints in the schema accordingly?

Best,

Felix

Am 12.12.12 19:13, schrieb Yves Savourel:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there is a description problem for the global rules for localization quality issue:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#lqissue-implementation
>
> For global rules the specification allows to have locQualityIssuesRef and the optional locQualityIssueSeverity, locQualityIssueProfileRef and locQualityIssueEnabled at the same time.
>
> But that contradicts the local rules where you can have only either standoff (with locQualityIssuesRef) or local on the node (with the other local attributes).
>
> It also makes little sense as the "complete override" aspect of ITS would render the attributes set in the global rule moot by the attributes in the standoff markup (or their absence).
>
> cheers,
> -yves
>
>
>
>
>