Re: [all] Call for consensus on disambiguation - feedback integrated [ACTION-181]

Hi,
I incorporated some comments that 'entity' was still conflated from 
several distinct things in the data category proposal. Now, we 
distinguish between disambiguation of word sense, ontology concept and 
entity instance. Following that, it seems that 'Disambiguation' was the 
better name for the data category.

Thanks for everyone's input!

-- Tadej

On 02. 08. 2012 17:26, Tadej Štajner wrote:
> Apologies -- wrong link on the previous mail. This is the relevant one:
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/181
> -- Tadej
>
> On 02. 08. 2012 17:22, Tadej Štajner wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>> this is the integration of the feedback points from the last call on 
>> the Entity data category and subsequently on the mailing list. I 
>> cleaned up and defined the terms, so it better fits both use cases, 
>> lexical as well as conceptual disambiguation, and introduced XPath 
>> variants of the attributes since they were used in the examples, but 
>> not defined anywhere.
>>
>> I'd ask anyone who's interested in taking another look. Otherwise, I 
>> think we can move forward.
>>
>> -- Tadej
>>
>> Related:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0280.html 
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0288.html 
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/181
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26. 07. 2012 15:47, Tadej Štajner wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> (cc-ing additional people who may be interested in this),
>>>
>>> this may be relevant at today's call. Here's a summary and 
>>> integration of what was going on around the named entity and 
>>> disambiguation data categories, along with usage in RDFa Lite.
>>>
>>> -- Tadej
>>>
>>> Related in https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/ :
>>> [ISSUE-2]
>>> [ISSUE-18]
>>> [ISSUE-29]
>>> [ISSUE-35]
>>> [ACTION-164]
>>>
>>
>