- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:43:44 -0600
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Comments inline. I will push a new dated version of this shortly. On 1/17/2012 5:20 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Here are my comments. > > > In the Status section: > > - "the document was published by the RDFa Working Group": formally, the WG's name is RDFWA. (Note, the same error is also present in the RDFa Core document!)' Fixed > > 4. XHTML+RDFa definiton > > The list of metainformation says: > > [[[ > XHTML+RDFa also uses the Ruby Annotation module as defined in [RUBY]: > > Ruby Annotation Module > ruby, rbc, rtc, rb, rt, rp > ]]] > > Why is Ruby singled out that way? It reads as if Ruby had a special role with RDFa which, afaik, isn't true. I would propose to just list it with the other modules without any special attention. It is separate because it is not a module produced as part of M12N core, but I dont suppose that is super relevant. Fixed > > 5.2 XHTML RDFa Initial Context > > The curent text says > > [[[ > This specification defines an RDFa Initial Context. It is available at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/xhtml-rdfa-1.1. > ]]] > > Strictly speaking, this specification does _not_ define an initial context, it just reuses one that is defined in another specification... I would like to leave this alone in case, some day, it diverges. > > E. Acknowledgement > > - It should refer to the RDFWA Group > - The list of members should be updated (and synchronized with the other documents!). Eg, Gregg or Niklas are missing. > Fixed. > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:44:09 UTC