Re: `overflow: hidden` on tables for border rounding doesn't seem to be supported by the standard

On 03/12/2011 18:35, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>
> Le Sam 3 décembre 2011 3:36, Anton Prowse a écrit :
>> On 02/12/2011 21:52, www-style@gtalbot.org wrote:
>>> Øyvind Stenhaug<oyvinds@opera.com>  a écrit :
>>>> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:47:47 +0100, Gérard Talbot
>>>> <www-style@gtalbot.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> overflow applies to inline-table elements though according to
>>>>> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-217
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't help think that it's kinda weird ... overflow applies to
>>>>> inline-tables but not to fixed-width tables.<shrug>
>>>>
>>>> The text modified due to that issue was since superseded by
>>>> <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-120>  and
>>>> <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-266>. Per the current spec
>>>> text, overflow does not apply to 'inline-table' nor 'table'.

[...]

>> In the Applies To line of the 'overflow' property, "non-replaced
>> block-level elements, table cells, and inline-block elements" should
>> have been changed to "block containers and table boxes" not to "block
>> containers".

[...]

>> Gérard, would you mind summarizing what the browser support is for
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/overflow-applies-to-013.htm.
>
> I can do this for overflow-applies-to-013.htm and
> overflow-applies-to-014.htm . Where do you want me to do this?

Thanks very much, Gérard.  I've created a bug for this issue: 
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15381.  If you would be 
willing to comment on that bug about browser support for your test, that 
would be great.  It's highly likely that the spec will be changed in 
errata to correspond to what it originally said.

Cheers,
Anton Prowse
http://dev.moonhenge.net

Received on Monday, 2 January 2012 11:09:19 UTC