Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]]

On 12/07/2011 16:39, Souripriya Das wrote:
> Given this, I'd propose that we create our own special R2RML IRI 
> constants: rr:IRI, rr:BlankNode, and rr:Literal. If we want emphasize 
> that these are constants, we could refine these a bit (e.g., rr:IRI, 
> rr:BLANKNODE, rr:LITERAL).
+1

Boris

Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 11:57:07 UTC