Some remarks on 4395bis from Mykyta Yevstifeyev on 2011-06-23 (public-iri@w3.org from June 2011)

From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:25:19 +0300
To: public-iri@w3.org
Message-ID: <4E02F86F.1060903@gmail.com>

Hello all,

I've recently re-read the IRI WG document - 4395bis draft 
(draft-ietf-iri-4395bis-irireg).  What I'd currently like to ask is why 
we want to write a new document obsoleting RFC 4395, but in fact 
repeating everything currently found in it modulo some minor 
clarifications and extending its action on schemes used with IRIs.  I 
personally think such approach is too heavyweight.  Couldn't writing and 
publishing an RFC updating RFC 4395 to accommodate IRI schemes in its 
registration procedures be enough?  Any thoughts on this?

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 08:25:11 UTC