- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:36:09 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On 10.11.2010 14:30, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 11/10/2010 08:27 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 10.11.2010 14:16, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> The HTML WG Chairs are evaluating the status of the current three >>> different ISSUE-27: rel-ownership change proposals. See: >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-027 >>> >>> Before the Chairs issue a survey on this issue we would like to ensure >>> that there is AT LEAST one "advocate" in the WG for each of the three >>> change proposals. If there are NO advocates for one or more of the >>> proposals then the Chairs propose to drop that change proposal from the >>> eventual WG survey on Issue-27 since we believe that will greatly >>> simplify the survey and the results processing. >>> >>> Please reply to this email if you are an advocate FOR one or more of the >>> following change proposals with a clear indication of which proposal(s) >>> you support: >>> >>> 1. Change Proposal: Replace Wiki-Based Link Relation Registry with IANA >>> registry proposed by "Web Linking" draft >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/1006.html >>> ... >> >> Me. >> >> Note that the change proposal originated from Mark Nottingham; I'm not >> sure whether it should be updated before a poll (reflecting publication >> of RFC 5988, supporting web sites, and initial registrations), though. > > Just be aware: we only intend to survey and evaluate proposals which > actually are received. Yes, but on the other hand all counter proposals were received after the deadline. So I think it would be fair to actually allow Mark to look at the CP and consider whether it needs an update. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 13:36:49 UTC