- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:48:08 +0100
- To: Robert Miner <robertm@dessci.com>
- CC: innovimax+w3c@gmail.com, ion@ams.org, www-math@w3.org
On 29/08/2010 00:17, Robert Miner wrote: > Thanks for voting Mohamed! > > @David, Patrick, > > We have concluded we can just go ahead and make corrections like the > ones Mohamed pointed out, right? > > Do we just update the cvs source as usual? I can probably do it. > > --Robert In the case of the reference to mathmlfor css profile, we should probably update it to the rec version (fixing date once we know the date both specs will have) or simply link to the undated version
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2010 09:48:33 UTC