- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:17:25 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 06/15/2010 06:02 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> Details >>> >>> The reference for ASCII must not be to a document that cannot be >>> obtained as plain text, HTML or PDF free of charge without a wrapper >>> format (such as zip) by issuing an HTTP GET request. The reference >>> should be to any resource, at the editor's discretion, that describes >>> ASCII and that can be obtained as plain text, HTML or PDF free of >>> charge without a wrapper format (such as zip) by issuing an HTTP GET >>> request. >> >> The above does not meet the criteria for a change proposal. Specifically[1]: >> >> Proposal Details: This may take one of the following four forms: >> >> * A set of edit instructions, specific enough that they can be >> applied without ambiguity. > > As editor I can confirm that the above details are a set of edit > instructions specific enough that I can apply them without ambiguity. Can you provide the text you intend to insert should the Working Group select this option? This information will be needed before we proceed to steps 4 or 6 of the Decision Process. - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 22:17:57 UTC